/* With U.S. casualties again spiking and American troops bogged down in Iraq indefinitely, there have been virtually no prominent articles taking the neocons to task for their lack of realism in failing to see the security risk their policies have created. */ I think that the blogosphere actually has been taking the neocons to task, and at least one member of Congress -- Ron Paul -- has dedicated chapters to them in his books. I think the problem is still that the national-level media companies refuse to acknowledge neoconservatism as a movement separate from their old enemy, conservatism. Neoconservatism is a combination of the two major Jewish movements of the twentieth century: Communism and Zionism. Most of the old neocons are actually ex-communists, but as David Horowitz has astutely observed, Communism and Zionism had considerable overlap among Jewish extremists, who often grew up siding with one or the other, but supporting both. Conservatism, on the other hand, is the ideology entailing that America return to its former roots as a European-American Christian state. Since the national media companies are deeply Caucasophobic, but also, deeply Judeocentric, they cast neoconservative Jews as plain 'ol conservatives, making it possible to bash them without risking the ire of the Jewish establishment. Thus, we get the relentless gushing over the 'war for oil' and never a decent criticism of the fact that, for four decades, the Jewish elite have been pressuring the government to destroy Iran, and, for three decades, pressuring the government to destroy Iraq. As long as the national media companies continue to openly engage in Judeocentrism instead of scrutinizing the actions of Jewish groups and the Israel lobby, we're going to get misleading coverage of the war in Iraq.
read more | digg story
